6 Best eSUB Alternatives for Contractors (2026)

eSUB carved out a niche in construction software by focusing on one audience: subcontractors. If you’re a sub who needs to document every daily report, change order, and delay for compliance and dispute protection, eSUB was designed for that exact workflow.

But for a lot of contractors, that narrow focus becomes a problem.

eSUB doesn’t do estimating. It doesn’t handle invoicing. There’s no CRM for tracking leads or following up on bids. The scheduling features are basic at best. And if you do any general contracting work at all, the platform simply wasn’t built for you.

Then there’s the pricing. eSUB doesn’t publish its rates. You have to talk to sales to get a quote, which makes it tough to compare costs before committing. For a tool that only covers part of your workflow, that’s a hard sell.

If you’re looking for an eSUB alternative, you probably want software that handles more of your business in one place. Here are six options worth considering.

Why Contractors Look for eSUB Alternatives

eSUB earned a loyal following among subcontractors who needed better documentation. The daily report workflow is solid, the change order tracking is thorough, and the compliance features help subs protect themselves during disputes. That paper trail has real value.

But the limitations add up.

Subcontractor-only focus. If your company does any GC work, eSUB doesn’t fit. The entire platform is designed around the subcontractor’s role on a project. There are no owner-facing tools, no bid management features, and no way to manage a project from the GC’s perspective.

No estimating. eSUB doesn’t help you build estimates or proposals. You still need a separate tool or spreadsheet for that, which means your estimate data doesn’t connect to your project data. When you want to compare what you bid against what you actually spent, you’re pulling numbers from two different places.

No invoicing. Same story here. eSUB tracks what happens on the job, but it doesn’t help you bill for it. Invoicing, payment tracking, and accounts receivable all require another system.

Custom pricing with no transparency. You can’t visit eSUB’s website and see what it costs. Every prospect goes through a sales call. That’s fine for enterprise software, but when the tool only covers documentation and compliance, many contractors want to know the price before investing time in a demo.

Limited scheduling. eSUB has some scheduling capabilities, but nothing close to what you’d get from a platform built around project management. No Gantt charts, no drag-and-drop crew scheduling, and no resource management across multiple projects.

Most contractors who leave eSUB aren’t unhappy with the documentation features. They just need software that runs more of their business without forcing them to buy three or four other tools.

The 6 Best eSUB Alternatives

1. Projul (Best Overall eSUB Alternative)

Best for: Small to mid-size contractors who want one platform for everything.

Projul is a construction management platform built for contractors who are tired of juggling multiple tools. Where eSUB handles documentation for subs, Projul handles the entire business workflow for both GCs and subcontractors.

You get a built-in CRM for managing leads and follow-ups. Estimating tools that pull from your cost history and material databases so your bids are accurate. Scheduling with drag-and-drop Gantt charts your whole team can see on any device. Job costing that compares your estimates to actual costs in real time. And project management tools that tie every phase of a job together from first call to final invoice.

The pricing model is the opposite of eSUB’s. Projul publishes its rates, charges a flat monthly fee, and includes unlimited users on every plan. No per-user fees. No mystery quotes. Your entire team gets access without driving up the bill.

Projul Pricing (Annual):

• Core: $4,788/year
• Core+: $7,188/year
• Pro: $14,388/year

All plans include unlimited users. See full pricing details.

Why contractors pick Projul over eSUB: You get a complete platform instead of a documentation tool. Estimating, scheduling, invoicing, CRM, time tracking, and job costing all live in one system. And the pricing is transparent and predictable.

What Projul does better than eSUB:

• Full estimating with cost databases and templates
• Invoicing and payment collection
• CRM with lead tracking and automated follow-ups
• Gantt chart scheduling with crew management
• Job costing with real-time budget tracking
• Works for GCs and subcontractors
• Unlimited users on every plan
• Published pricing with no sales call required

Where eSUB still wins: If your only goal is subcontractor compliance documentation and dispute protection, eSUB’s focused workflow is purpose-built for that. But most contractors need more.

2. Procore

Best for: Large commercial contractors and enterprises.

Procore is the industry leader in enterprise construction management. It handles project management, financials, quality and safety, and field coordination across large project portfolios. If you’re running $50M+ in annual revenue with complex commercial projects, Procore has the tools to match.

Procore’s strength is its depth. Document management, RFIs, submittals, bidding, budgeting, and change management are all built in. The platform handles collaboration between GCs, subs, owners, and architects on large commercial jobs.

Procore Pricing:

• Custom pricing based on annual construction volume
• Typically $10,000 to $50,000+ per year
• Additional modules may require separate fees

What Procore does well: Enterprise-scale project management, document control, financial tracking, and multi-party collaboration. The mobile app is solid, and the integration library is extensive.

Where Procore falls short for eSUB users: The cost and complexity are overkill for most small to mid-size contractors. Implementation takes weeks or months, and you’ll need dedicated admin resources. Procore also doesn’t include a CRM, and its estimating capabilities are limited compared to tools built for that purpose.

3. Buildertrend

Best for: Residential builders, remodelers, and home service contractors.

Buildertrend was built for residential construction. It covers the full project lifecycle including pre-sale proposals, selections, scheduling, daily logs, change orders, and a client portal that homeowners can use to track progress and make decisions.

For contractors coming from eSUB’s subcontractor world, Buildertrend opens up the GC side of the business. You can manage leads, create proposals, schedule work, communicate with clients, and handle financials in one platform.

Buildertrend Pricing:

• Essential: $499/mo
• Advanced: $799/mo
• Complete: $1,099/mo

What Buildertrend does well: Residential workflows, client portals, selections management, and homeowner communication. The scheduling and daily log features cover what eSUB offers while adding much more.

Where Buildertrend falls short: It’s designed for residential work. Commercial subs and GCs running non-residential projects often find the workflows don’t match their needs. The interface can feel busy, and pricing has increased considerably over the past few years. The learning curve is also steeper than it first appears.

4. Fieldwire

Best for: Field teams that need task management and plan viewing.

Fieldwire focuses on getting information to the field. Plan viewing, task management, punch lists, and inspections are the core features. If your biggest pain point is making sure your crew has the right drawings and knows what to do each day, Fieldwire handles that well.

Hilti acquired Fieldwire in 2021 and has added BIM viewing and expanded the feature set. But at its core, Fieldwire is still a field management tool, not a complete business platform.

Fieldwire Pricing:

• Basic: Free (limited to 5 users, 3 projects)
• Pro: $39/user/mo
• Business: $64/user/mo
• Business Plus: $89/user/mo

What Fieldwire does well: Plan viewing, task management, punch lists, and inspections. The mobile experience is fast and easy for field crews to learn.

Where Fieldwire falls short: Like eSUB, Fieldwire doesn’t include estimating, invoicing, CRM, or job costing. It also charges per user, so costs climb as your team grows. A 10-person team on the Business plan runs $640/mo for field tools only.

5. PlanGrid (Autodesk Build)

Best for: Large teams already using Autodesk products.

PlanGrid was a pioneer in mobile plan viewing for construction. After Autodesk acquired it in 2018, the product was merged into Autodesk Build as part of the Autodesk Construction Cloud. If your company already uses Revit, AutoCAD, or other Autodesk tools, the integration is a natural fit.

Autodesk Build covers document management, issue tracking, field data capture, and project management with strong BIM support.

Autodesk Build Pricing:

• Custom pricing through Autodesk sales
• Typically $60 to $85/user/mo depending on the package
• Annual contracts required
• Bundle discounts available with other Autodesk products

What PlanGrid/Autodesk Build does well: Plan management, BIM integration, document control, and issue tracking. Strong for teams working with 3D models and complex drawing sets.

Where it falls short: The PlanGrid to Autodesk Build transition frustrated many longtime users. Features changed, the interface was redesigned, and pricing went up. It still doesn’t include estimating, invoicing, or CRM. Small to mid-size contractors will find it expensive and more complex than necessary for their needs.

6. STACK

Best for: Contractors who need strong estimating and takeoff tools.

STACK is a cloud-based estimating and takeoff platform. If your biggest gap after leaving eSUB is accurate estimating, STACK fills that hole. The platform handles digital takeoffs, material quantification, and estimate building with a clean interface that works directly from your plans.

STACK is particularly strong for contractors who do a lot of bidding and need to turn plans into accurate numbers quickly. The takeoff tools are precise, and the estimating templates save time on repetitive bid work.

STACK Pricing:

• Takeoff: Free (limited features)
• Estimating: Custom pricing (contact sales)
• Pre-construction suite: Custom pricing

What STACK does well: Digital takeoffs, estimating, material quantification, and bid management. It’s one of the better standalone estimating tools on the market.

Where STACK falls short: STACK focuses on pre-construction. It doesn’t cover project management, scheduling, invoicing, time tracking, or field management. Once you win the bid, you need a separate platform to manage the job. It’s a point solution, not a complete business tool.

eSUB vs. Projul: A Quick Comparison

Feature	eSUB	Projul
Daily Reports	Yes	Yes
Estimating	No	Yes
Invoicing	No	Yes
CRM	No	Yes
Scheduling (Gantt)	Basic	Yes
Time Tracking	Yes	Yes (GPS verified)
Job Costing	Limited	Yes
Client Portal	No	Yes
Works for GCs	No	Yes
Pricing Transparency	No (custom quotes)	Yes (published rates)
Pricing Model	Custom/per user	Flat rate (unlimited users)
QuickBooks Sync	Limited	Full sync

How to Choose the Right eSUB Alternative

Your choice depends on what your business looks like today and where it’s heading.

If you need a complete business platform: Projul replaces eSUB plus your estimating tool plus your invoicing tool plus your CRM. One login, one subscription, unlimited users. It works for both GCs and subs.

If you’re a large commercial operation: Procore gives you enterprise-grade project management, financials, and collaboration. Plan for a bigger budget and a longer implementation.

If you build homes: Buildertrend’s residential focus, client portal, and selections management are designed for your workflow.

If you need better field tools: Fieldwire is strong for plan viewing and task management, but you’ll still need other software for business operations.

If you use Autodesk products: PlanGrid (Autodesk Build) integrates with your existing tools, though the cost and complexity may be more than you need.

If estimating is your biggest gap: STACK is one of the strongest standalone estimating and takeoff platforms available. Just know you’ll need something else for everything after the estimate.

For most contractors outgrowing eSUB, the pattern is the same. You started with a tool that does one thing well, and now you need software that covers the rest. Buying four separate tools to fill the gaps costs more money, creates more data silos, and wastes more time than a single platform that handles it all.

Making the Switch from eSUB

Moving away from any software can feel like a big deal, especially when your daily reports and project documentation live there. Here’s how to make it smooth:

1. Export your data. Before you cancel anything, pull your daily reports, change orders, and project records out of eSUB. Most platforms accept standard file formats for migration.
2. Identify your full needs. List every tool you currently use alongside eSUB, including spreadsheets for estimating, QuickBooks for invoicing, email for lead tracking. Your new platform should replace as many of those as possible.
3. Compare total cost. Don’t just compare eSUB’s price to the new tool’s price. Add up what you spend on all your current tools combined. A platform like Projul often costs less than the combination of eSUB plus an estimating tool plus a CRM plus a scheduling tool.
4. Run a pilot. Start with one project or one crew. Get comfortable with the new workflow before rolling it out company-wide.
5. Train the team. Construction software only works if your crew actually uses it. Pick a platform with solid onboarding support, training videos, and a responsive help team.

What to Look for in Construction Management Software

Switching from eSUB is a good time to think about what you actually need from construction software, not just today but as your business grows. Here are the features that matter most for contractors who want one platform instead of a patchwork of tools.

Estimating that connects to project data. Your estimates should flow directly into your project budgets. When you win a bid, the line items from your estimate should become your budget categories for job costing. If you have to re-enter data manually, you are wasting time and introducing errors. Look for software that lets you build an estimate, convert it to a project, and track actual costs against budgeted costs without switching between systems.

Scheduling that your whole team can see. A schedule that only lives on the office whiteboard does not help your foreman in the field. You need scheduling that syncs across devices so everyone, from the office to the job site, sees the same timeline. Drag-and-drop Gantt charts with crew assignments, dependency tracking, and notifications when things change are table stakes in 2026.

Mobile access that actually works. Construction happens in the field, not at a desk. Any software you choose needs a mobile app that loads fast, works on spotty cell service, and lets your crew log time, submit daily reports, take photos, and check schedules without fighting the interface. If the mobile experience feels like a shrunken desktop app, your crew will not use it.

Integration with your accounting software. Most contractors run QuickBooks, and your project management tool needs to sync with it cleanly. That means pushing invoices, syncing payments, and matching job costs without manual data entry. A broken or limited QuickBooks integration creates more work than it saves.

Reporting that shows you the real numbers. You need to see profitability by project, by project type, and by time period. Which jobs made money? Which ones lost money? Where did the budget blow up? Good reporting turns your project data into business intelligence that helps you make better decisions on future bids and resource allocation.

Hidden Costs of Using Multiple Construction Tools

One of the biggest reasons contractors leave eSUB is that it forces them to buy additional software for everything it does not cover. That patchwork approach seems manageable at first, but the hidden costs add up fast.

Subscription stacking. eSUB for documentation, plus a separate estimating tool, plus QuickBooks for invoicing, plus a CRM for lead tracking, plus a scheduling app for your crews. Each one charges its own monthly fee. Add per-user pricing on two or three of those tools, and a 10-person team can easily spend $1,500 to $2,000 per month on software that does not even talk to each other.

Data silos. When your estimate lives in one tool, your schedule lives in another, and your invoices live in a third, nobody has the full picture. Your project manager cannot see the budget while checking the schedule. Your estimator cannot reference past job costs while building a new bid. Every time someone needs information from a different system, it requires a phone call, an email, or a manual export.

Training burden. Every tool has its own interface, its own login, and its own learning curve. New hires need to learn three or four systems instead of one. That slows down onboarding and increases the chance that someone skips a step because they forgot which tool handles which task.

Lost data between systems. Manual data entry between disconnected tools introduces errors. A change order logged in eSUB does not automatically update the budget in your accounting software. A schedule change does not notify the estimator that timelines shifted. These gaps create real financial risk because decisions get made on stale or incomplete information.

Opportunity cost. The time your team spends switching between tools, re-entering data, and chasing information across platforms is time they are not spending on billable work, client communication, or business development. For a small company, that lost productivity can easily exceed the cost of the software itself.

The math usually works in favor of consolidation. One platform that handles estimating, scheduling, job costing, invoicing, CRM, and time tracking typically costs less than three or four separate tools. And the productivity gains from having everything connected are significant. When your estimator can pull actual cost data from completed jobs while building a new bid, your bids get more accurate. When your project manager can see the budget, the schedule, and the daily logs in one view, problems get caught earlier.

Questions to Ask During Your Software Demo

Once you have narrowed your list down to two or three options, the demo is where you separate marketing promises from reality. Here are the questions that reveal the most about whether a platform will actually work for your business.

“Can you show me the mobile app on a real phone?” Not a screenshot, not a simulation. Hand the rep a phone and ask them to log a daily report, check a schedule, and submit a time entry. If the mobile experience is clunky or slow, your field crew will not adopt it.

“How does data move between estimating and job costing?” Ask them to create a quick estimate, convert it to a project, and show you where actual costs appear against the original budget. If this requires manual steps or data re-entry, that is a red flag.

“What does QuickBooks sync look like?” Ask to see the actual sync settings, not just a slide that says “QuickBooks integration.” How often does it sync? Is it two-way or one-way? What happens when there is a conflict? The details matter.

“What happens when we hit 20 users?” Per-user pricing tools get expensive fast. Ask what the total cost looks like at your current team size and at double that size. Flat-rate pricing like Projul’s means your cost stays the same as your team grows.

“Can I see a real report?” Ask to see a job profitability report or a labor cost summary from actual (or realistic demo) data. If the built-in reports do not answer the questions you care about, you will end up exporting to spreadsheets anyway.

“What does onboarding look like?” How long does implementation take? Is there a dedicated onboarding person? What training resources exist for field crews who do not like learning new software? The best tool in the world fails if your team will not use it.

These questions cut through the demo polish and reveal how the software handles the real work of running a construction business. Take notes, compare answers across vendors, and involve the people on your team who will use the tool daily.

eSUB Limitations for Growing Contractors

eSUB works well enough when your company is small and your role on every project is clearly defined as a subcontractor. But as your business grows, the cracks in that narrow focus become harder to ignore.

You start taking on GC work. Many subcontractors eventually move into general contracting, whether that means self-performing more scopes or managing other subs on smaller projects. eSUB has no tools for that transition. There is no way to manage bids from subcontractors, no owner-facing communication tools, and no way to track a project from the GC’s seat. The moment you take on your first GC project, you need a second platform.

Your team grows past 10 people. When you had a five-person crew, one daily reporting tool was fine. But at 15 or 20 people across multiple job sites, you need scheduling that coordinates crews across projects, time tracking that ties labor hours to specific cost codes, and job costing that shows you which projects are making money and which are bleeding. eSUB does not provide that level of operational visibility.

You need to win more work. eSUB has no CRM. It does not help you track leads, follow up on proposals, or manage your sales pipeline. As your company grows, the difference between landing three out of ten bids and landing five out of ten bids is the difference between a good year and a great one. A CRM that tracks every prospect from first contact through signed contract gives you that edge. Relying on email threads and mental notes does not scale.

Your accounting gets more complex. At a certain size, you cannot afford disconnected systems. Your daily logs need to feed into your job costing. Your job costing needs to sync with your accounting software. Your invoicing needs to pull from completed work tracked in the field. eSUB handles the first step but leaves you to bridge everything else manually. That manual bridging is where errors, delays, and lost revenue hide.

You want to see the big picture. Growing contractors need dashboards that show profitability across all active projects, not just compliance documentation for individual jobs. They need to compare estimated versus actual costs, track cash flow, and forecast resource needs for upcoming work. eSUB gives you a filing cabinet for your paperwork. It does not give you a command center for your business.

The frustration is not that eSUB is bad at what it does. The frustration is that what it does is not enough once your company reaches a certain size. Every gap in eSUB’s feature set becomes a separate tool, a separate login, and a separate monthly invoice. That fragmentation slows you down at exactly the moment you need to move faster.

Daily Reporting Feature Comparison

Daily reports are the one area where eSUB genuinely excels. It was built around that workflow, and the depth shows. But daily reporting has evolved, and several platforms now match or exceed what eSUB offers while connecting those reports to the rest of your project data.

Here is how daily reporting features compare across the top eSUB alternatives:

Feature	eSUB	Projul	Procore	Buildertrend	Fieldwire
Daily log creation	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Photo attachments	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Weather tracking	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Crew hours logging	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Limited
Equipment tracking	Yes	Yes	Yes	Limited	No
Material usage	Yes	Yes	Yes	Limited	No
Visitor log	Yes	No	Yes	No	No
Subcontractor log	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Limited
Safety observations	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Offline access	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Connects to job costing	No	Yes	Yes	Limited	No
Connects to invoicing	No	Yes	No	Yes	No
GPS-verified entries	No	Yes	No	No	No

The key difference is what happens after the daily report gets submitted. In eSUB, the report lives in a documentation silo. It serves its purpose for compliance and dispute protection, but it does not feed into your budget, your schedule, or your invoicing workflow.

In Projul, a daily log entry connects directly to your project timeline and cost tracking. Labor hours logged in the field automatically appear in your job costing reports. Materials documented on a daily report can be matched against purchase orders. That connection between field documentation and financial data is what turns daily reporting from a compliance checkbox into a management tool.

Procore offers a similar connected experience, but at enterprise pricing that puts it out of reach for most small and mid-size contractors. Buildertrend connects daily logs to its residential workflow but lacks the depth for commercial subcontractor documentation. Fieldwire keeps daily reporting lightweight, which is an advantage for simple task tracking but a limitation when you need detailed crew and material documentation.

For contractors leaving eSUB, the question is not whether other tools can handle daily reports. They can. The question is whether you want your daily reports to actually drive your business decisions or just sit in a folder for when someone files a claim.

Migration Path from eSUB

Switching construction software sounds disruptive, but with the right approach it does not have to slow down your active projects. Here is a step-by-step migration path that contractors have used successfully when moving from eSUB to a more complete platform.

Step 1: Audit your current tools. Before you touch anything, list every piece of software your team uses. eSUB for daily reports, maybe a spreadsheet for estimating, QuickBooks for accounting, your email inbox as a CRM, a shared calendar for scheduling. Write down what each tool costs per month and what data lives inside it. This audit tells you exactly what your new platform needs to replace.

Step 2: Export your eSUB data. Pull every daily report, change order record, project document, and photo archive out of eSUB. Most of this data exports as PDFs or CSV files. Store these exports in a shared drive or cloud folder organized by project. Even after you leave eSUB, you may need this documentation for warranty claims, disputes, or audits years down the road. Do not skip this step.

Step 3: Set up your new platform on one project first. Do not try to migrate everything at once. Pick one active project, preferably one that is still in early stages, and set it up completely in the new system. Build the estimate, create the schedule, assign the crew, and start logging daily reports there. This pilot project is where your team learns the new workflow without the pressure of a company-wide rollout.

Step 4: Run both systems in parallel for 30 days. During your pilot period, keep eSUB active on your other projects. This overlap costs you one extra month of eSUB subscription, but it eliminates the risk of losing data or missing documentation during the transition. Your team gets comfortable with the new tool while your existing projects continue uninterrupted.

Step 5: Train your field crews. The biggest risk in any software migration is adoption. If your foremen and crew leads do not use the new tool, it does not matter how many features it has. Schedule hands-on training sessions, not just video links. Walk them through the daily log workflow, the time tracking process, and how to check the schedule on their phones. Platforms like Projul offer dedicated onboarding support with a real person who guides your team through the transition.

Step 6: Migrate remaining projects. Once your pilot project is running smoothly and your team is comfortable, move your other active projects into the new system one at a time. For projects that are nearly complete, it may make more sense to finish them in eSUB and start fresh in the new platform on your next job.

Step 7: Cancel eSUB and consolidate. After all active projects are running in the new system and your team has confirmed that daily reporting, scheduling, and subcontractor management workflows are working, cancel your eSUB subscription. Keep your exported data backups. You are done.

The entire migration typically takes 30 to 60 days for a small to mid-size contractor. The key is doing it gradually rather than flipping a switch overnight. Every contractor who has made this transition says the same thing: the hardest part was deciding to start. The actual migration was easier than expected.

Choosing the Right Subcontractor Management Platform by Company Size

Not every contractor needs the same software. The best eSUB alternative for a five-person electrical sub is different from the best option for a 50-person mechanical contractor running $15M in annual revenue. Here is how to match your platform to your company size.

Solo operators and crews under 5 people. At this size, simplicity wins. You need daily reporting, basic scheduling, invoicing, and time tracking. You do not need enterprise features, complex permission structures, or tools designed for 200-person organizations. Projul’s Core plan covers everything a small crew needs at a flat rate with unlimited users, so you are not penalized when you hire your fourth or fifth person. Fieldwire’s free tier can work here too, but only if you do not need estimating or invoicing.

Small contractors with 5 to 15 people. This is where most eSUB users land, and it is also where the limitations hurt the most. At this size, you are probably doing your own estimating, managing two to five active projects, and starting to feel the pain of disconnected tools. You need a platform that handles the full workflow from lead to invoice. Projul and Buildertrend both serve this market well. Projul works for both commercial and residential contractors. Buildertrend is stronger if you focus exclusively on residential work.

Mid-size contractors with 15 to 50 people. At this scale, you need robust scheduling across multiple crews and projects, detailed job costing with cost code breakdowns, and reporting that shows profitability by project type. You also need subcontractor management tools if you are coordinating with other subs or self-performing multiple scopes. Projul’s Pro plan and Procore both work here. The deciding factor is usually budget. Projul’s flat rate stays the same regardless of team size. Procore’s pricing scales with your construction volume and can reach $30,000 or more per year.

Large contractors with 50+ people. At this level, you are likely evaluating Procore, Autodesk Build, or a combination of enterprise tools. The software decision becomes a company-wide IT project with stakeholders from operations, finance, and field management. Implementation timelines stretch to months, and you need dedicated admin resources to maintain the system. If you are reading this article because you are a 50-person company still using eSUB for documentation, the honest answer is that you outgrew it a long time ago.

The common thread across all sizes. Regardless of your team size, the core principle is the same: fewer tools is better. Every additional platform you add creates friction, data gaps, and training overhead. The contractors who run the most efficient operations are the ones who consolidated their software stack early. They picked one platform that could grow with them instead of bolting on new tools every time they hit a limitation.

If you are evaluating eSUB alternatives right now, think about where your company will be in two years, not just where it is today. The best time to consolidate your software is before the pain of fragmentation becomes unbearable. The second best time is now.

Ready to replace eSUB with something that runs your whole business? Check out Projul’s pricing or schedule a demo to see the platform in action.